The Congress (INC) - Rise & a Sudden Fall

The history of the Indian National Congress (INC) is a complex and multifaceted narrative that spans over a century. From its inception as a platform for voicing Indian grievances under British colonial rule to its role as a dominant political force in post-independence India, Congress has played a pivotal role in shaping the nation's political landscape. This document will delve into the extensive history of Congress and explore the factors contributing to its challenges and perceived downfall until 2021.

I. Formation and Early Years (1885-1947)

The Indian National Congress was founded on December 28, 1885, with the aim of seeking constitutional reforms within the British colonial framework. Leaders like Allan Octavian Hume, Dadabhai Naoroji, and Womesh Chunder Bonnerjee led the initial efforts.

The early years saw a moderate approach advocating for a larger Indian role in governance and representation. Key milestones include the demands for greater Indian representation in the British Indian Civil Service, opposition to the Partition of Bengal, and the Swadeshi Movement.

II. Transition to Mass Movement (1919-1947)

The turning point came after the Jallianwala Bagh massacre in 1919. The repressive Rowlatt Act and the lack of political concessions led to a more radical shift within the Congress. Under leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, Sardar Patel, and Fateh Singh Rana (he was less known)  the Congress transformed into a mass movement for independence.

The Non-Cooperation Movement (1920-1922), Civil Disobedience Movement (1930-1934), and Quit India Movement (1942) marked significant phases of struggle against British rule. The Congress aimed to galvanize the masses and garner support from various sections of society.

III. Post-Independence Challenges (1947-1966)

After India gained independence in 1947, the Congress became the dominant political party. However, the challenges of nation-building, integrating princely states, and economic development posed significant hurdles. The leadership of Jawaharlal Nehru brought a mix of socialist and non-aligned policies.

Differences in ideologies, such as Nehru's approach versus the more socialist views of leaders like Jayaprakash Narayan, led to internal divisions. These divisions manifested in debates over economic planning, land reforms, and foreign policy.

IV. The Congress and Regional Politics (1966-1984)

The Congress faced regional challenges and identity politics during this period. The rise of regional parties and demands for linguistic states led to the reorganization of states along linguistic lines. Indira Gandhi's leadership saw the imposition of the Emergency (1975-1977), which led to widespread criticism.

During this period, the Gandhi family began its entry into the leadership of the Indian National Congress (INC), marking the initiation of a legacy of family-based politics. She assumed the role of Prime Minister from 24th January 1966 to 24th March 1977, and subsequently, from 14th January 1980 to 31st October 1984.

Indira Gandhi's assassination in 1984 marked a tragic turn of events, followed by anti-Sikh riots in Delhi. The subsequent leadership changes and political maneuvers showcased the internal conflicts within the party.

In 1977, the Indian National Congress (INC) altered its previous emblem, which coincided with a change in its ideology. Since then, they began to refer to themselves as a secular party. However, their focus continued to remain on minority groups, diverting from their original ideology. This shift also allowed regional parties to expand under the banner of secularism, albeit by downplaying Hindu aspects. From my perspective, the decline of the Congress began when they abandoned their previous symbol of a Cow and its calf, opting for the Hand symbol. This decision contributed to a growing disconnect from Hindus, which subsequently widened.

V. Coalition Era and Relevance (1984-2004)

The Congress faced a decline in the 1990s, partly due to the rise of coalition politics. Economic liberalization and globalization policies were initiated, changing the economic landscape. Congress struggled to adapt to these shifts, and its core support base began to erode.

Mr. Rajiv Gandhi, a member of the Lok Sabha at the time, assumed the position of Prime Minister of India shortly after the tragic assassination of Mrs. Indira Gandhi on 31st October 1984. He served as Prime Minister until the completion of his five-year term in 1989.

During his tenure, a prominent case known as the Shah Bano case garnered significant attention. In 1985, the highest court in India ruled in favor of Shah Bano, a Muslim divorcee, and ordered her ex-husband to provide her with an alimony amount. This decision by the Supreme Court was met with strong criticism from the Indian Muslim community. In response, the Parliament passed The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act in 1986. This legislation effectively nullified the Supreme Court's judgment in the Shah Bano case. The Act stipulated that alimony for divorced women could only be provided during the Iddah period or up to 90 days after the divorce, in accordance with Islamic laws.  This shows that Congress was very much after the impeachment of minorities as a secular front they should think about the Muslim women who were seeking justice for them but it was overruled and Islamic laws were very kept for its enactment.  This shows that Congress has nothing to do with the Women's rights irrespective of religion beliefs and laws. 

The rise of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and other regional parties challenged the Congress's national dominance. However, the Congress managed to form coalition governments at the center.

VI. Congress in the 21st Century (2004-2021)

Mrs Sonia Gandhi, after her husband's assassination, was extended an invitation by Congress leaders to assume leadership of the party, but she turned it down. In 1997, after persistent appeals from the party, she finally consented to enter the realm of politics. In the subsequent year, she was put forward as a nominee for the position of party president, and she won the election against Jitendra Prasada

The Congress made a comeback in 2004 by leading the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) to victory. Manmohan Singh's tenure as Prime Minister saw continued economic growth and social programs. However, issues of corruption, policy paralysis, and inadequate job creation marred the party's reputation.

In March 2004, Rahul Gandhi made known his initiation into politics by stating his intention to participate in the 14th general elections. He declared his candidacy for the Lok Sabha, from the constituency of Amethi in Uttar Pradesh, a seat previously held by his father. His mother had represented the seat until she shifted to the adjacent Raebareli constituency. Rahul Gandhi's announcement came unexpectedly to political analysts, who had regarded his sister, Priyanka Gandhi, as the more charismatic and potential successor.

The 2014 general elections marked a significant blow for the Congress, as the party faced a historic defeat. The BJP, under Narendra Modi, secured a clear majority. The Congress's inability to effectively counter the BJP's campaign and the lack of a coherent narrative contributed to this downfall.

In subsequent state elections, Congress faced mixed outcomes. While it managed to secure victories in some states, it struggled to regain a strong national footing. Factionalism, leadership vacuums, and ideological ambiguities further weakened the party's appeal.

Now, Congress is trying to project Mrs Priyanka Vadra. Priyanka Gandhi Vadra was appointed as a general secretary of the Congress party on 23 Jan, 2019, a move that comes approximately two months ahead of the 2019 Lok Sabha elections. Priyanka Gandhi, who is the younger sibling of Congress president Rahul Gandhi, has been entrusted with the responsibility for Uttar Pradesh East.

This marks the first instance where Priyanka Gandhi has assumed an official role within the Congress party. Nonetheless, she has had some involvement in politics, albeit to a limited extent. Priyanka Gandhi has participated in rallies alongside Rahul Gandhi and her mother, Sonia Gandhi.The Gandhi Family's presence in the Congress party spans from 1998 to 2022. 

However, it is widely speculated that Mr. Mallikarjun Kharge merely serves as a figurehead representing the family. With Mr. Priyanka's notable entry, it is expected that she will assume the helm of the Congress Party's highest leadership position in the near future.

VII. Challenges and Factors Contributing to Downfall

Several factors contributed to the perceived downfall of the Indian National Congress up until 2023:

1. Leadership Crisis: The Congress party faced difficulties in identifying charismatic and unifying leaders capable of effectively engaging with the public and presenting a coherent vision. This challenge emerged following Congress's attempt to position Mr. Sonia Gandhi as the successor within the Gandhi family. However, she declined the position of Prime Minister.  In March 2004, Rahul Gandhi made his foray into politics by announcing his intention to participate in the 14th general elections. He declared his candidacy for the Lok Sabha, India's lower house of Parliament, from the constituency of Amethi in Uttar Pradesh, which had previously been represented by his father However, the Congress was unable to recapture its former glory, and after Rahul Gandhi assumed leadership, the party began to lose its traditional stronghold in states as well as at the national level.

2. Internal Divisions: Factionalism, regionalism, and ideological differences within the party weakened its unity and undermined its ability to present a cohesive front. 

3. Lack of Clear Ideological Narrative: The party faced challenges in articulating a contemporary and relevant ideological narrative that could resonate with a diverse and changing electorate. The Congress party's apathetic approach towards Hindus played a pivotal role in their decline. They openly criticized Hindu traditions and even questioned the existence of deities like Lord Rama.  Even Ramsetu was questioned that it is not related the Ramayan. 

4. Anti-Incumbency and Corruption Allegations: The Congress faced anti-incumbency sentiment in many states and was plagued by allegations of corruption, which damaged its credibility.

5. Failure to Adapt: The party struggled to adapt to changing political landscapes, especially with the rise of regional parties and the BJP's effective use of social media and modern campaigning techniques.  

6. Lack of Grassroots Engagement: The Congress's disconnect from grassroots-level politics and its overemphasis on top-down decision-making alienated its traditional support base.

7. Communication Gap: The party faced challenges in effectively communicating its policies and achievements to the public, resulting in a perception gap.

VIII. Conclusion

As of 2023, the Indian National Congress finds itself at a critical juncture. While the party has a rich history and played a pivotal role in India's struggle for independence and nation-building, it has faced significant challenges and setbacks in recent decades. The party's ability to rejuvenate, adapt, and reconnect with the aspirations of the Indian electorate will determine its future trajectory. The Congress's fortunes will depend on its capacity to overcome internal divisions, articulate a clear and relevant ideological stance, and effectively address the changing dynamics of Indian politics.

• Congress needs to contemplate a change in leadership, which cannot be assumed as a given. If the Congress party truly upholds democratic values, they should steer clear of perpetuating a family-dominated approach and consider a more suitable candidate for the role of Prime Minister. Mr. Rahul Gandhi is prepared to relinquish his claim to the position, demonstrating his genuine commitment to the Congress party.

• The Congress Party needs to unite all communities and its leaders should recognize that they cannot win elections or make a comeback by insulting the majority community, such as Hindus. 

• Being secular does not imply undermining one particular religion at the expense of disregarding others' sentiments. The Congress party cannot assert that Muslims have the first claim on national resources. They should refrain from questioning the existence of Lord Rama and the majority population of India.

• Congress party ought to remove several leaders who are inclined towards catering to only a specific segment of religion or are overly enthusiastic about undermining the dominant Hindu majority through insulting means. A genuine secular equilibrium is essential for the well-being of all.

• If the Congress intends to make a resurgence, they must embrace the implementation of Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), National Register of Citizens (NRC), and Uniform Civil Code (UCC) to safeguard our nation against both internal and external challenges. Particularly, the adoption of UCC is imperative to achieve a harmonious balance among all religions.

• If they genuinely aim to restore their former glory, they should consider adopting a new symbol representing the Cow and its Calf. This step could assist them in rebuilding the trust and confidence of the Hindu majority.

Written by : Baalwant Singh Raana ( Rana Bhardari)  

Mamata Banerjee is against NRC, Why?

The National Register of Citizens (NRC) is an official record that contains the names of Indian citizens residing in a particular state or region. Its main purpose is to distinguish between genuine Indian citizens and undocumented immigrants. The NRC process involves verifying the citizenship status of individuals based on specific documents and criteria.

The NRC process gained significant attention and controversy in India due to its implementation in the northeastern state of Assam. The aim was to identify and exclude individuals who couldn't provide adequate proof of their citizenship, particularly those who might have immigrated illegally from Bangladesh or other countries. The implementation process involved scrutinizing various documents to establish a person's familial and residential ties to the region prior to a certain cutoff date.

NRC, or the National Register of Citizens, holds a significant position on the BJP's agenda. This entails determining the precise count of citizens based on their religious background. The intention behind this is to fortify the country's defenses against infiltration, primarily from nations like Bangladesh. Nonetheless, a number of opposition leaders, in fact all of them, are opposed to the NRC. Their opposition is rooted in the belief that its implementation might disillusion Muslims. I find it puzzling why the implementation of NRC would lead to disappointment among Indian Muslims.

Mamata Banerjee has vehemently stated her refusal to permit the central government to enforce the NRC within her state. One might question her authority to make such a determination. If the central government is striving to enact certain legislation with national security in mind, it seems counterintuitive for a Chief Minister to obstruct it. Her rationale appears to rest on an unsubstantiated claim that Muslims would be adversely affected. But why is that the case? The following are Mamata Banerjee's statements, in which she attempts to justify her position for the sake of her voter base, although these justifications seem detached from reality. Here are my thoughts on these objections:

Mamata Banerjee, the Chief Minister of West Bengal, was known for her strong opposition to the implementation of the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in the state. Her stance was based on several reasons:

• Humanitarian Concerns: Mamata Banerjee expressed concern that the implementation of the NRC could lead to the exclusion of a significant number of genuine Indian citizens, especially marginalized and vulnerable populations who might struggle to provide the required documentation. She was worried that this could result in people being rendered stateless and facing humanitarian crises.  

This assertion lacks a strong foundation as it centers on the validation of citizens' authenticity. We cannot permit our nation to suffer due to the infiltration of outsiders. If individuals are indeed genuine citizens, they should be able to produce supporting documents. Conversely, those who cannot do so may find themselves living as refugees. Consequently, they would not possess the privilege to cast their votes. This situation poses a significant challenge for Mamata Banerjee. Her main concern seems to revolve around the voting rights of these individuals. Denying them voting eligibility would render them advantageous for Mamata Banerjee's TMC party. Presently, they constitute her core voter base, with a significant portion being Muslims. This is likely why she is approaching the Muslim issue in a defensive manner.

• Political Opposition: Banerjee is a prominent leader of the Trinamool Congress (TMC) party in West Bengal. Her opposition to the NRC also had political motivations, as it helped her rally support among minority communities and portray herself as a defender of their rights. This was particularly significant given the religious and ethnic diversity of West Bengal's population.

Indeed, the stance appears to be influenced by political motives, which is why she opposes implementing the NRC within the region. The primary apprehension revolves around Muslim voters who stand to lose their foothold. A substantial number among them are believed to have immigrated from Bangladesh, and they currently form a significant support base for the TMC party. The question arises: why should we grant them the privilege of voting if they are unable to establish their citizenship?

• Fear of Disruption: The implementation of the NRC involves a complex and often controversial process of verifying citizenship based on documents. Banerjee was concerned that such an exercise could lead to social unrest, given the diverse demographics of West Bengal, and potentially disrupt the harmony in the state.

What sort of disruption would ensue? We're simply aiming to recognize, register, and accord rights to the legitimate citizens of our nation. It's unreasonable to allow our resources and the rights of our own populace to be consumed by those who are in the wrong. We mustn't permit our resources to be taken advantage of by infiltrators who are residing within our country without proper authorization. These very individuals are the ones constantly flouting our laws, disturbing local communities, and posing security risks to our nation.

• Economic Impact: The process of implementing the NRC can be financially burdensome, requiring significant resources and administrative efforts. Banerjee may have also been concerned about the economic implications of diverting resources to this exercise instead of developmental initiatives.

A Story of Political Ambition & formation of Pakistan in 1947.

The formation of Pakistan as a country is a complex historical process that emerged from a combination of political, social, and religious factors. It cannot be attributed to a single person's fault, but rather a culmination of events and decisions over time.

The idea of a separate Muslim state in the Bharatiya subcontinent gained momentum during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Muslims, a significant religious minority in British Bharat, began to express concerns about their political and cultural rights within a predominantly Hindu-majority region. Leaders like Sir Syed Ahmad Khan advocated for the protection of Muslim interests, he was used to do this. Syed Ahmad Khan was earlier not in favour of Muslim nation but he was convinced to propose for it . 

The All India Muslim League, founded in 1906, played a pivotal role in shaping the demand for a separate Muslim state. Under the leadership of figures like Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the League called for the creation of Pakistan as a way to ensure the rights and representation of Muslims. Jinnah's leadership and negotiations with the British and the Indian National Congress were crucial in advocating for the separate state.

The fault lines leading to the partition of Bharat and the creation of Pakistan were complex and interwoven. The British colonial rule exacerbated religious and communal tensions, often using a policy of "divide and rule" that exacerbated differences between Hindu and Muslim communities. Socio-economic disparities and cultural differences further deepened the divide, making it difficult to establish a unified Bharatiya identity.

The failures of political leadership and inability to forge a consensus also contributed to the eventual partition. The Indian National Congress, the principal party advocating for a united Bharat, had leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru and Mahatma Gandhi who were committed to a secular and inclusive nation. However, negotiations between Congress and the Muslim League faltered on issues of power-sharing, representation, and the role of religion in the state.

The communal violence that erupted in the run-up to and after partition was a tragic consequence of these underlying tensions. The violent partition resulted in the displacement and death of millions of people along religious lines. The scars of this event continue to affect relations between Bharat and Pakistan to this day.

While the idea of a separate Muslim state had gained prominence, the formation of Pakistan wasn't solely a result of religious sentiment. It also involved geopolitical factors. The end of World War II weakened the British Empire, prompting them to relinquish control over their colonies. The creation of Bharat and Pakistan was a way to manage the transition of power, but the hasty nature of this transition and the poorly defined borders contributed to further conflicts.

It's important to note that there were diverse viewpoints within the Muslim community regarding the idea of a separate state. Not all Muslims supported the creation of Pakistan, and regions like Punjab and Bengal had substantial non-Muslim populations that were deeply affected by the partition.

One distinguished politician arrived to facilitate the division process, Sardar Patel, who was not in favor of dividing Bharat. However, circumstances were beyond his control. His counsel was not heeded by Jawaharlal Nehru, Jinnah, and other members of the Congress. Despite outward appearances of Mr. Nehru's opposition to partition and the creation of a separate Muslim nation, there seemed to be some arrangements made between Jinnah and Mr. Nehru behind the scenes. 

Further, Sardar Patel attempted to persuade Mahatma Gandhi that Bharat remained a united nation, and that religious divisions shouldn't lead to separation. Nevertheless, events unfolded differently in the end.

Sardar Patel played a significant role in the partition of Bharat and the formation of Pakistan. He was a key leader in the Indian National Congress and was involved in negotiations with British officials and leaders of various communities during the critical period of partition in 1947.

While Patel supported the idea of a united Bharat, he also recognized the growing communal tensions between Hindus and Muslims. He worked to ensure the rights and protections of minorities, but as the partition became inevitable, he focused on facilitating a smooth and orderly division of assets, resources, and administration.

It's worth noting that while Patel was a proponent of the partition, he held a strong belief in secularism and unity. He played a crucial role in integrating the princely states into the newly independent Bharat, using diplomacy and persuasion to bring them together.

Overall, Sardar Patel's efforts were aimed at maintaining stability and preserving the interests of all communities during this tumultuous time in Indian history.

In conclusion, the formation of Pakistan as a separate country was the culmination of complex historical, political weakness, religious facilitation, and social factors. It was not solely the fault of any one individual or group.

It appears that there were certain troublemakers, individuals aspiring for political power, who aimed to divide Bharat. Which politicians and political parties refused to assist Sardar Patel in preventing this division and also neglected to propose him as a candidate for prime minister? He got caught up in political turmoil instigated by his own party leaders. Many Bharatiya favored Sardar Patel becoming the first Prime Minister of Bharat.

Another query arises: during the religious-based partition, who encouraged Muslims to remain in Bharat and for what reason? I am not opposed to Muslims, but the question remains about what kind of conspiracy was carried out by whom? What was the underlying motive for all of this? Why was Pakistan created? Was it simply to further Jinnah's political ambitions and those who supported him?

The approach to settling matters in both countries was not harmonious. Millions had to leave their homeland, and millions perished in violent riots. Even after 78 years, the wounds remain open, causing pain and unrest. Pakistan continues to disrupt our nation, sowing division and sending terrorists to disrupt our peace, pride, and patience.

Due to various reasons, whether deliberate or driven by other motives, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel was not appointed as the first Prime Minister of India. Had the leaders of the Congress at that time designated or nominated Sardar Patel as the Prime Minister, Pakistan might not have been formed, and today, India could have been the world's leading economy, establishing itself as a superpower.

On the occasion of the 77th Independence Day, I urge citizens of both nations to exchange love and affection, and to live as harmonious neighbors. 

"History must not replicate its negative aspects, but it should be reenacted by the populace if it entails positive outcomes"  

Product placement strategy and Kirana Retailers. An overview

data-ad-client="ca-pub-7790660518805226">

Product placement at Kirana retailers has become an increasingly prominent marketing strategy in recent years. These small neighborhood stores, known as Kirana retailers, hold a significant share of the retail market in many countries, particularly in India. With their extensive network and regular customer interactions, Kirana retailers provide an ideal platform for brands to showcase their products in a subtle yet effective manner. The concept of product placement involves integrating branded items within the store's layout, creating an unobtrusive yet noticeable presence that can significantly influence consumer behavior.

In the fiercely competitive consumer market, brands are constantly seeking innovative ways to capture the attention of potential buyers. Kirana retailers offer a unique advantage due to their widespread distribution across both urban and rural areas, catering to diverse demographics. By placing products strategically within these stores, companies can tap into a vast customer base that ranges from daily wage earners to affluent individuals. This diversity allows for tailored product placement that suits the preferences and needs of different consumer segments. For instance, placing premium products at eye level might attract higher-income customers, while essentials could be positioned in easily accessible locations for the convenience of the masses.

The effectiveness of product placement at Kirana retailers lies in its subtlety. Unlike traditional advertising methods, which consumers might actively avoid, strategically placed products become a natural part of the shopping environment. As customers move through the store, they encounter these items seamlessly integrated into their surroundings. This unobtrusive approach can foster a sense of familiarity and trust between consumers and brands, potentially influencing purchase decisions. Moreover, the frequency of visits to Kirana retailers ensures repeated exposure to these products, reinforcing brand recognition and recall.

Collaborations between brands and Kirana retailers can yield mutual benefits. Small retailers often face challenges competing with large supermarket chains and e-commerce platforms. Partnering with brands for product placement can provide them with additional revenue streams and access to marketing resources they might not have otherwise. Brands, on the other hand, can leverage the retailers' established customer relationships and insights into local preferences to tailor their product placement strategies effectively. This symbiotic relationship can contribute to the overall growth of both parties involved.

In the digital age, data-driven decision-making is paramount. Kirana retailers are not exempt from this trend. Advanced analytics can help brands identify the most suitable products for placement based on sales data, consumer demographics, and buying patterns. By incorporating technology into the process, brands can ensure that their product placement strategies are optimized for maximum impact. Additionally, data analysis can provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of different placement techniques, enabling brands to refine their strategies over time.

However, like any marketing strategy, product placement at Kirana retailers also presents challenges. Ensuring consistent and standardized placement across multiple retailers can be a logistical hurdle. Brands need to maintain regular communication and training with retailers to ensure that the intended placement is executed accurately. Moreover, striking the right balance between visibility and integration is crucial. Overly conspicuous placements can come across as forced and may alienate customers, negating the strategy's benefits.

In conclusion, product placement at Kirana retailers offers a powerful and nuanced approach to reaching consumers in an increasingly cluttered market. The strategy's subtlety, combined with the widespread presence of Kirana retailers, provides brands with a unique opportunity to engage diverse customer segments. As brands and retailers collaborate to refine their product placement techniques using data-driven insights, this strategy is poised to continue evolving and playing a pivotal role in the marketing landscape.

Written by :Balwant Singh Rana

Uttarakhand Film Industry and its Struggle

Uttarakhand, nestled in the lap of the Himalayas, is a land of mesmerizing beauty, rich traditions, and a diverse cultural tapestry. The state is divided into two distinct regions, Garhwal and Kumaon, each with its own cultural nuances and storytelling traditions.

 The slow development of Garhwali cinema is a reflection of the complexities involved in capturing and presenting these narratives in a cinematic format.

One of the primary challenges that the Garhwali film industry faced in its formative years was the scarcity of resources. Unlike the more established Bollywood industry, which enjoys vast financial backing, Garhwali filmmakers often struggled to secure funding for their projects. This financial constraint led to limitations in production quality, hindering the industry's ability to compete on a broader scale.

Moreover, the lack of proper infrastructure, such as well-equipped studios and advanced post-production facilities, further impeded the growth of Garhwali cinema. Filmmakers had to work with limited technical resources, impacting the overall visual and auditory experience of their creations. The absence of these crucial elements slowed down the development of the industry as a whole.

In the face of these challenges, what emerged was a group of passionate filmmakers who were determined to give a voice to the unique stories and traditions of the region. These filmmakers, often driven by a sense of duty to their cultural heritage, embarked on their creative journeys with limited resources but boundless enthusiasm. Their dedication and resilience played a pivotal role in keeping the flame of Garhwali cinema alive.

The slow development of Garhwali cinema also enabled a more profound focus on authentic storytelling. With limited resources at their disposal, filmmakers turned to narratives that resonated with the local population. These stories often revolved around themes of rural life, folklore, and the struggles faced by the local communities. By delving into these themes, Garhwali filmmakers were able to create a cinematic experience that resonated deeply with the audience.

Furthermore, the slow pace of development allowed for a stronger connection to the cultural heritage of the region. Filmmakers had the time to meticulously research and accurately portray the customs, traditions, and languages of the Garhwal region. This attention to detail added authenticity to the films and fostered a sense of pride among the local population.

As the years rolled by, the efforts of these dedicated filmmakers began to bear fruit. The slow but steady growth of Garhwali cinema saw the release of several notable films that garnered attention not only within Uttarakhand but also in various film festivals across the country. These films, marked by their sincere storytelling and earnest performances, showcased the potential that the Garhwali film industry held.

The journey of Garhwali cinema, though marked by its gradual progress, stands as a testament to the power of passion and perseverance. The industry's growth was hampered by financial limitations, lack of infrastructure, and limited visibility. However, the commitment of filmmakers to their cultural heritage, their determination to tell authentic stories, and their ability to connect with the local audience played a crucial role in shaping the industry.

As we look to the future, the slow development of Garhwali cinema serves as a reminder that growth does not always need to be rapid to be meaningful. The industry's gradual rise allowed for a stronger foundation to be built, one rooted in the values and traditions of the region. With the advent of improved technology, increased awareness, and a growing appreciation for regional cinema, the Garhwali film industry is poised to take its well-deserved place on the national stage, showcasing the vibrant culture and untold stories of Uttarakhand's Garhwal region.

Key pointers,

  Story

  Finance

  Starcaste

  Distribution

  Marketing

Lets connect the dots and find a best environment which will help Uttarakhand Film Industry to grow like Bollywood. 

Written by Baalwant Singh {ranabhardari}

The Impact of Excessive Mobile Phone Use at Home

Title: The Impact of Excessive Mobile Phone Use at Home: Threats to Social Interaction and Well-being

In an age dominated by technological progress, the omnipresence of mobile phones within our homes has reshaped the way we interact. While these devices offer unparalleled connectivity and convenience, the unintended consequences of their overuse are undermining the fabric of family relationships and sparking concerns about potential health risks.

The Erosion of Social Interaction: Gone are the days when homes served as sanctuaries for meaningful human connection. The rise in smartphone usage finds family members frequently engrossed in screens, sacrificing precious moments of face-to-face dialogue and shared experiences. The irony is stark: devices designed to foster connectivity are paradoxically disconnecting us from those closest to us.

The ramifications of this trend run deep. Children raised in homes where parents prioritize screens over conversations risk missing out on crucial emotional bonds. Couples may coexist physically, yet their moments of genuine connection are often hijacked by the ceaseless allure of virtual interactions. Grandparents, once the storytellers and carriers of tradition, now vie for attention against gadgets clamoring for their grandchildren's focus. This decline in direct interactions undermines the formation of lasting memories and chips away at the foundation of familial unity.

The Demise of Discourse: How Smartphones Are Undermining Conversations.   More details you can click this like  of  https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1590&context=ots_masters_projects

Health Hazards of Excessive Screen Time: Despite the allure of mobile phones, their health risks are frequently underestimated. Within the confines of our homes, this problem is exacerbated. Prolonged screen time, often coupled with sedentary behavior, is linked to weight gain, metabolic imbalances, and a host of physical health issues.

The blue light emitted by screens disrupts our circadian rhythms, disturbing sleep patterns. This disruption, compounded by pre-sleep scrolling, can lead to sleep deprivation and its manifold consequences – from irritability and reduced cognitive function to compromised immune responses. Thus, the infiltration of mobile phones into our homes inadvertently subjects us to a cycle that undermines our well-being.

Highlights: 

1. Obesity: The more television and video content your child consumes, the higher the likelihood of them becoming overweight
2.  Disrupted sleep patterns.
3. Behavioural challenges
4. Diminished academic achievement
5. Exposure to violence
6. Reduced opportunities for play

Breaking the Cycle: Escaping the grip of excessive mobile phone use necessitates deliberate action and family unity. Initiating open conversations about the negative effects of excessive screen reliance is crucial. Designating screen-free zones at home, such as the dining area or designated family spaces, can foster real-time conversations and facilitate meaningful interactions.

Promoting alternative activities that do not involve screens is pivotal for reshaping family dynamics. Engaging in communal endeavors such as board games, cooking together, or outdoor adventures can rebuild bonds and rekindle the joy of shared experiences. Moreover, instituting a "digital curfew" before bedtime can alleviate sleep disruptions and enhance overall health.

Conclusion: As we race to embrace technological advancements, we stand at a crossroads. The overuse of mobile phones at home, while providing instant connectivity, imperils the essence of family bonds and compromises our well-being. By setting boundaries, prioritizing genuine interactions, and reclaiming our homes as sanctuaries of human connection, we can mitigate the detrimental effects of excessive screen time. Let us remember that authentic connectivity thrives not in the virtual realm, but in the warmth of face-to-face interactions and the shared moments with our loved ones.

Qualities needed to become a political leader in Bharat

                                         Political Leader  =  Service Excellency

Politics is not a business enterprise that you shall learn to embark upon. Rather, it is a resolute journey of service, demanding steadfast dedication to toil tirelessly for the very citizens you aspire to guide.

Becoming a political leader in Bharat,  is a multifaceted and ambitious goal that demands a deep understanding of the nation's intricate social fabric, diverse culture, historical legacy, and complex political landscape. To embark on this transformative journey, you must weave together personal growth, political acumen, and a genuine commitment to serving the people.

Begin by immersing yourself in Bharat's rich history, diverse traditions, and cultural nuances. Bharat's past is a tapestry of civilizations, religions, and ideologies that have shaped its present identity. Familiarize yourself with the multiple languages, traditions, and customs that define different regions and communities, fostering a deeper connection with citizens across the country.

Education forms the cornerstone of effective leadership. Cultivate a strong academic foundation by studying political science, public administration, law, or social sciences. An in-depth understanding of Bharat's political structure, from local panchayats to the national parliament, is essential. Delve into the Constitution of Bharat, grasp its fundamental principles, and internalize the rights and responsibilities it bestows upon both citizens and leaders.

Networking is pivotal in Bharatiya politics. Forge connections with local leaders, community organizers, and members of civil society. Engage with individuals from various walks of life to gain insights into their concerns, dreams, and challenges. Volunteering with non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and grassroots initiatives allows you to experience the ground realities that shape the lives of ordinary citizens.

Effective communication skills are the bedrock of leadership. Polish your ability to communicate eloquently in multiple languages and through diverse mediums. Engage in public speaking, debate clubs, and media interactions to refine your articulation. Recognize the influence of social media as a dynamic tool for connecting with youth, urban populations, and the digitally engaged.

Participate actively in social and political activism to demonstrate your dedication to public service. Address local issues and advocate for causes that resonate with the populace. By participating in rallies, town hall meetings, and public debates, you can amplify awareness about critical matters within your constituency.

Cultivate a comprehensive understanding of policies and ideologies. Study the platforms of different political parties, analyze their manifestos, and acquaint yourself with international political developments that may impact Bharat's trajectory. Consider aligning with a political party that reflects your values and objectives. Often, the path to political leadership begins with local elections, allowing you to contest positions such as panchayat members or municipal councillors.

Unwavering integrity and ethical conduct are non-negotiable traits. Uphold moral principles consistently and embrace a strong sense of accountability. Bharatiya citizens place immense significance on the character of their leaders, and your actions should mirror the values you advocate for.

Develop empathy by actively listening to the concerns of individuals hailing from diverse backgrounds. In a heterogeneous nation like Bharat, issues vary dramatically from region to region. Your capacity to establish personal connections will elevate your credibility as a leader.

Last but certainly not least, it's imperative not to replicate the style of any renowned leader; instead, it's more prudent to engrain your own distinctive character. Maintain an unwavering commitment to honesty in all your actions. Let your guiding principle be the service of the Nation. Always bear in mind that politics is not akin to a business venture that you simply list in the occupation section. It must perpetually remain a service. In current times, politics has transformed into a substantial commercial enterprise, and this evolution has transpired without the injection of capital. If your aspiration is to amass wealth from the realm of politics, it's crucial to reconsider. Even if monetary gain is achieved through such means, the eventual outcome will be laden with bitterness and futility. Eventually, you may find yourself ensnared within the confines of political reprisal, leading to the forfeiture of not only financial assets but also your esteem and integrity.

Above all, perseverance is paramount. Bharatiya politics can be tumultuous, and success might be a gradual process. Embrace failures as stepping stones to growth, and steadfastly pursue your objective. As you aspire to be a political leader in Bharat, remember that this role entails shepherding a vast and intricate nation toward unity and progress. Your journey necessitates a fusion of cultural awareness, educational depth, networking prowess, effective communication, dedicated activism, unwavering integrity, empathetic engagement, and resolute perseverance. By intertwining these qualities, you can pave the way to make a profound and enduring impact on the political landscape of  Bharat.

Writer : Baalwant Singh Raanaa ( Rana Bhardari)

Becoming a social worker is a rewarding and challenging career

Becoming a social worker is a rewarding and challenging career that requires a combination of personal qualities, skills, and education. Here are some essential qualities that can help you become an effective and successful social worker:

1. Empathy: Social workers need to be empathetic and compassionate towards the people they serve. Understanding and connecting with individuals' emotions and experiences are vital in providing effective support and guidance.

2. Active Listening: Listening actively and attentively to clients is crucial in understanding their needs and concerns. Social workers must be able to communicate effectively and create a safe space for people to share their thoughts and feelings.

3. Problem-Solving Skills: Social workers often deal with complex and challenging situations. Having strong problem-solving skills can help in assessing issues, developing appropriate interventions, and finding solutions that improve clients' lives.

4. Patience: Social work can be a slow and sometimes frustrating process. Patience is essential when working with individuals or communities who may be facing difficult circumstances and are in need of time and support to make positive changes.

5. Non-Judgmental Attitude: Social workers must be non-judgmental and open-minded, respecting the diverse backgrounds and experiences of their clients. This attitude is essential in building trust and creating a positive working relationship.

6. Communication Skills: Effective communication is a core skill for social workers. This includes not only listening but also conveying information clearly and sensitively to clients, colleagues, and other professionals.

7. Flexibility: Social work can be unpredictable, and situations may change rapidly. Being adaptable and flexible in approach allows social workers to respond to evolving needs and challenges effectively.

8. Cultural Competence: Social workers work with individuals from diverse cultural backgrounds. Being culturally competent helps in understanding and addressing the unique needs and challenges faced by different communities.

9. Resilience: Social work can be emotionally demanding, and social workers may face burnout or secondary trauma. Building resilience and practicing self-care are essential to maintain emotional well-being.

10. Advocacy Skills: Social workers often advocate on behalf of their clients to access resources and services. Advocacy skills, including understanding policies and navigating bureaucracies, are important in securing support for those in need.

11. Professional Ethics: Social workers adhere to a code of ethics that guides their practice. Upholding ethical standards and maintaining professional boundaries are crucial in establishing trust and credibility.

Becoming a social worker typically involves obtaining a relevant degree (such as a Bachelor's or Master's in Social Work) and gaining practical experience through internships and fieldwork. Certification and licensure requirements vary by location and specialization.

Overall, being a social worker requires a genuine passion for helping others and a commitment to social justice and equality. It can be a challenging yet fulfilling career path for those who are dedicated to making a positive impact on individuals and communities in need.

Listen to your heart first, and if you've got empathy for the living world, you can be the finest social worker

Writer: Rana Bhardari, 3.8.23, Delhi, India

The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) of Bharat

The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) of Bharat, passed in December 2019, is a piece of legislation that aims to grant Bharatiya citizenship to certain undocumented immigrants from neighboring countries. The Act has been a subject of immense controversy and debate, evoking mixed reactions from various segments of society. Supporters argue that the CAA is a step towards providing refuge and protection to persecuted minorities from Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh, while critics express concerns about its potential to discriminate against Muslim immigrants and violate the principles of secularism enshrined in the Bharatn Constitution.

The CAA amended the Citizenship Act of 1955, introducing new provisions that allow eligible immigrants from specific religious communities (Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi, and Christian) who entered Bharat on or before December 31, 2014, to apply for citizenship. The Act aimed to address the predicament of these immigrants, who had fled religious persecution in their home countries and sought shelter in Bharat. By facilitating their naturalization, the CAA intended to grant them legal status and protect them from deportation.

Proponents of the CAA argue that it is a humanitarian gesture, aligning with Bharat's ethos of providing refuge to those in need. They highlight that the Act specifically targets religiously persecuted minorities, who have faced discrimination and violence in their countries of origin. Supporters point to the historical significance of Bharat as a refuge for religious minorities and argue that the CAA is a continuation of this humanitarian tradition.

Moreover, advocates contend that the CAA does not affect the existing citizenship rights of Bharatiya citizens, regardless of their religion. It provides a pathway to citizenship only for eligible immigrants who meet the specified criteria. The Act, in their view, is essential to safeguarding the cultural and religious identity of persecuted communities and strengthening Bharat's national security.

On the other hand, opponents of the CAA criticize the legislation for excluding Muslim immigrants from its purview. They argue that the Act's focus on non-Muslim religious groups suggests a discriminatory intent and violates the principle of equality enshrined in the Bharatiya Constitution. Critics fear that the CAA, combined with the proposed National Register of Citizens (NRC), could potentially lead to the exclusion and statelessness of Muslim immigrants who fail to produce adequate documentation.

Criticism of the CAA also extends to concerns about its impact on the demography and secular fabric of Bharat. Critics argue that the Act's selective approach could create religious divisions and undermine the secular nature of the Bharatiya state. They raise concerns about the potential marginalization and discrimination of Muslim communities, leading to increased polarization and communal tensions.

Protests against the CAA erupted across the country following its passage, with citizens expressing their dissent through various peaceful demonstrations and strikes. Several state governments, led by different political parties, even announced their refusal to implement the CAA, citing constitutional concerns and apprehensions about its implications on social harmony.

The issue of the CAA reached the Supreme Court of Bharat, where various petitions challenging the Act's constitutionality were filed. The court began hearing these petitions and is expected to provide a legal verdict on the matter. The Supreme Court's decision will play a crucial role in determining the future of the CAA and its implications on Bharat's citizenship and secular framework.

The implementation of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) in Bharat, as perceived by its supporters, is believed to offer several potential benefits for the country:

 

1.   Humanitarian Gesture: The CAA is seen as a humanitarian gesture by providing citizenship to undocumented immigrants who have faced religious persecution in neighboring countries. It aligns with Bharat's historical role as a safe haven for religious minorities seeking refuge.

 

2.   Protection of Minorities: The Act aims to protect religious minorities, such as Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis, and Christians, who have fled persecution in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh. Granting them Bharatiya citizenship offers legal status and safeguards against potential deportation.

 

3.  Strengthening National Security: Supporters argue that the CAA can help address security concerns by providing a legal framework for monitoring and regulating the status of immigrants. By granting citizenship to eligible immigrants, the government can better track their movements and integrate them into society, ensuring national security.

 

4.    Boost to Demographic Stability: The CAA's proponents argue that it can help in stabilizing the demographic composition of certain regions where the influx of persecuted minorities has been significant over the years. This is seen as an important measure to maintain cultural and religious diversity in those regions.

 

5.     Attracting Investments and Talent: By offering citizenship to persecuted minorities, the CAA may attract skilled professionals and investments from the affected communities. This influx of talent and resources could potentially contribute to Bharat's economic growth and development.

 

6.    Preserving Cultural Heritage: The CAA aims to protect and preserve the cultural heritage of the persecuted communities by providing them with a safe and secure environment in Bharat. This can foster greater integration and social harmony.

 

7.  Diplomatic Considerations: The implementation of the CAA may have positive diplomatic implications, strengthening Bharat's position as a responsible and compassionate global player committed to protecting human rights and religious freedom.

 

The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) is met with opposition from the various parties in Opposition who voice concerns for the Muslim community, as they feel uncertain about whether the CAA would safeguard the religious interests of Muslims. 

However, it is important to consider the plight of minorities facing intolerable conditions in countries mentioned in the Bill, struggling due to radicalization or political instability, and seeking refuge in Bharat, minorities but excluding Muslims. The CAA can provide a pathway to Indian citizenship for such persecuted communities. In my opinion, Muslims should not oppose this Bill, as it does not prevent them from seeking refuge in Bharat if they face threats in countries mentioned in the Bill. 

Plea behind this is that for Muslims there are more than 50+ Muslim countries where they can see shelter in case of any religious prosecution or political instability. Our perspective on this matter does not aim to oppose Muslims; rather, it emphasizes that minorities from countries name mentioned in the Bill, our ethnic Indian communities, such as Hindus, Jains, Buddhists, etc., who wish to come to India, can do so following the rules of this Act and attain Indian citizenship without any fear. 

 

It appears that there is a lack of logical reasoning behind the opposition to the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) by the Muslim community and certain political parties, particularly those with leftist inclinations, who often show support for specific communities. It is crucial to consider the plight of ethnic communities living in distress in other countries and seeking refuge in Bharat.

In conclusion, the Citizenship Amendment Act of Bharat has been a contentious and polarizing issue, sparking passionate debates across the country. While supporters argue that the Act fulfills the moral duty of providing a safe haven for persecuted minorities, critics express concerns about its potential to discriminate against Muslim immigrants and undermine Bharat's secular ethos. The CAA's implementation has been met with public protests and legal challenges, highlighting the deeply divided perspectives on the legislation's intent and consequences. As the matter remains sub judice before the Supreme Court, it is essential for all stakeholders to engage in constructive dialogue and uphold the principles of democracy, equality, and inclusivity while addressing the complexities surrounding the CAA.

We strongly support the implementation of the CAA in Bharat before 2029, and this should be carried out without any fear or discrimination.

Regards/

Baalwant Singh Raanaa

President - Parjakalyanm 

Uniform Civil Code [UCC] in Bharat and its Implication

   Uniform Civil Code [UCC]  in Bharat and its Implication

The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) of Bharat, a proposed reform aimed at unifying personal laws governing various religious communities, has been a long-standing vision for the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). With plans to implement the UCC in 2024, the BJP seeks to replace the diverse set of religious laws pertaining to marriage, divorce, inheritance, and other personal matters with a single, secular set of laws applicable to all citizens, regardless of their religious affiliations. 

The goal behind this initiative is to promote gender equality, social justice, and national integration, as it aims to bring about a more cohesive and unified legal framework for the diverse Bharatiya society. However, the implementation of the UCC remains a subject of significant debate and scrutiny, as it touches upon sensitive issues related to religious beliefs and practices. 

The BJP's push for the UCC reflects their commitment to a more progressive and inclusive Bharat, but it also poses challenges in balancing the principles of secularism with respecting the diversity of cultural and religious practices in the country.

Benefits of Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in Bharat:

1. Gender Equality: UCC aims to remove gender-based discrimination prevalent in personal laws of different religious communities, promoting equality and justice for all citizens.
2. National Integration: By unifying personal laws, UCC fosters a sense of unity and strengthens national integration by promoting a common set of values and principles.
3. Simplified Legal System: Replacing multiple personal laws with a single code would lead to a more straightforward and uniform legal system, making it easier for citizens to understand and navigate.
4. Secularism: UCC ensures that the state does not favor or discriminate against any particular religion, emphasizing the secular principles of the Bharatiya Constitution.

Issues with Uniform Civil Code:

1. Religious Sensitivities: Implementing a UCC might be met with resistance from religious communities who fear that their traditional practices and customs could be compromised or diluted.
2. Cultural Diversity: Bharat is a diverse nation with multiple cultures and traditions. A one-size-fits-all approach through UCC may not consider the unique aspects of each community.
3. Legal Complexity: The process of integrating different personal laws and traditions into a single code could be complex and challenging.
4. Political Opposition: The UCC remains a contentious issue, and some political parties may oppose it due to religious or cultural reasons.

Political Parties Opposing the Uniform Civil Code of Bharat:

1. All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB): AIMPLB represents the Muslim community in Bharat and opposes the UCC, fearing that it may infringe upon their religious and personal rights.
2. All India Majlis-e-Ittehad-ul-Muslimeen (AIMIM): AIMIM is a party that primarily represents the Muslim community and has expressed reservations about the UCC.
3. Some regional parties and leftist groups: Certain regional parties and left-leaning groups also oppose the UCC, viewing it as an infringement on the autonomy of different communities.
4. A newly formed alliance of opposition parties, recently launched under the name I.N.D.I.A., consists of 26 members who are opposed to the implementation of the Uniform Civil Code (UCC)

It's important to note that the UCC has been a topic of debate for several decades, and the opposition to it is not limited to any specific political party or community. The implementation of the UCC requires a careful balancing act between the principles of secularism, cultural diversity, and the need for gender equality and social justice.

My intake on this:   The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) should be implemented without any fear, discrimination, or political advantage, and without any further delay. The primary reason behind the implementation of the UCC is to promote gender equality, particularly for women in our country. It will enable them to abide by the rules confidently and participate in the country's development. Currently, inequality persists due to religious aspects, where women are compelled to adhere to customs, limitations, and sometimes face forceful imposition or restrictions imposed by men.

When it comes to the cultural and legal aspects of different ethnic groups, there should be no favoritism, just like the implementation of the Bharatiya Penal Code (IPC) does not differentiate based on one's origin or beliefs. The law should always be enforced without any bias or emotion.

Regarding the political unrest among the opposition parties, a significant opposition could arise from the renamed Congress-led alliance, I.N.D.I.A. However, despite their artificial agreement in ideology, I believe that many members of the alliance might eventually join the BJP's side to extend their support for the implementation of the Uniform Civil Code (UCC).

It is evident that political tensions are running high among the opposition parties, particularly with the emergence of the I.N.D.I.A   Alliance, given their alignment with the impeachment of a special section of the minority. As a result, I believe the magnitude of their unrest would be substantial. However, when considering the greater good of the nation and the significant relief and benefit the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) could bring to a large section of society, such agitations should be addressed rationally, devoid of emotions. The implementation of UCC stands to benefit a considerable number of women, and the government should prioritize their well-being, rather than delving deeply into the concerns of parties that focus solely on specific sections of society or their individual interests.

While they might resist the implementation of the UCC, it's essential to address their concerns and engage in constructive dialogue. As we seek support from various political factions, it is crucial to maintain transparency and respect differing viewpoints. Collaborating with those willing to join the cause can strengthen our position and ensure a more inclusive and effective implementation of the UCC. Our focus should be on promoting the benefits of the UCC, such as gender equality and national integration while addressing the legitimate apprehensions of opposing parties. With a united effort, we can pave the way for a more just and harmonious legal framework that resonates with the diverse cultural fabric of our nation.

Please provide your comments in the comment section below or leave a message with 'Yes - supporting UCC' or 'No - opposing UCC'. We will combine the mandate and forward the results to the UCC Implementation Committee.

Thanking you,  

Sincerely yours,

Baalwant Singh Raanaa

President - Parjakalyanm

parjakalyanm@gmail.com 

2nd August, 2023

Empowering Bharat through One Nation, One Rule

Parjakalyanm: Empowering Bharat through One Nation, One Rule. Advocating UCC, NRC, and CAA in India, and also supporting a two-party democracy instead of a multi-party system. Amendments to the Constitution will be implemented to bring about these changes.

Greetings, fellow citizens of Bharat! We are thrilled to announce the launch of our NGO, "Parjakalyanm," dedicated to making a positive impact on society by upholding the principles of One Nation, One Rule. As we stand on the cusp of a new era, we firmly believe that embracing Uniform Civil Codes is essential for ensuring unity and equal rights for all citizens, irrespective of their religious or belief systems.

🤝 Our Ideology: One Nation, One Rule 🤝

The guiding philosophy behind Parjakalyanm is rooted in the idea of unification, where all citizens of Bharat are treated equally under a uniform set of laws. We envision a nation where no individual is subject to discrimination or injustice based on their faith or background. By advocating for Uniform Civil Codes, we strive to create a harmonious society that promotes inclusivity and respect for all.

🗣️ Liberty of Speech and Social Harmony 🗣️

While we uphold the right to freedom of speech as a fundamental aspect of democracy, we also recognize that with great freedom comes great responsibility. At Parjakalyanm, we firmly believe that liberty of speech should not be exploited to disturb social harmony or incite hatred. We advocate for responsible speech that fosters understanding, tolerance, and empathy among our diverse communities.

🕊️ Fostering Social Harmony 🕊️

Our NGO is committed to fostering social harmony by promoting dialogue, education, and cultural exchange among different religious and belief groups. By organizing interfaith events and workshops, we aim to break down barriers and foster mutual respect among all citizens. We firmly believe that by understanding and embracing our differences, we can build a stronger, more united Bharat.

📜 Equal Rules for All 📜

Equality is at the core of our values. We believe that all citizens should be subject to the same set of laws, irrespective of their religion or belief. Uniform Civil Codes offer a fair and equitable framework, ensuring that every individual enjoys the same rights and protections under the law. This vision of equal rules for all is pivotal to creating a just and progressive society.

🤲 Join Hands with Parjakalyanm 🤲

We invite all like-minded individuals, organizations, and citizens who share our vision of One Nation, One Rule, to join hands with us. Together, we can make a meaningful impact on society, promoting unity and fostering social welfare for all.

Let's pave the way towards a brighter and more inclusive Bharat, where every citizen stands united under the banner of equality and harmony. Join us on this incredible journey as we work tirelessly to realize our dream of a nation that truly lives by the principles of One Nation, One Rule.

Stay tuned for updates on our upcoming projects and events. Together, we can create a better tomorrow for Bharat!

#Parjakalyanm #OneNationOneRule #EqualRulesForAll #SocialHarmony #InclusiveBharat #UnityInDiversity