Mamata Banerjee is against NRC, Why?

The National Register of Citizens (NRC) is an official record that contains the names of Indian citizens residing in a particular state or region. Its main purpose is to distinguish between genuine Indian citizens and undocumented immigrants. The NRC process involves verifying the citizenship status of individuals based on specific documents and criteria.

The NRC process gained significant attention and controversy in India due to its implementation in the northeastern state of Assam. The aim was to identify and exclude individuals who couldn't provide adequate proof of their citizenship, particularly those who might have immigrated illegally from Bangladesh or other countries. The implementation process involved scrutinizing various documents to establish a person's familial and residential ties to the region prior to a certain cutoff date.

NRC, or the National Register of Citizens, holds a significant position on the BJP's agenda. This entails determining the precise count of citizens based on their religious background. The intention behind this is to fortify the country's defenses against infiltration, primarily from nations like Bangladesh. Nonetheless, a number of opposition leaders, in fact all of them, are opposed to the NRC. Their opposition is rooted in the belief that its implementation might disillusion Muslims. I find it puzzling why the implementation of NRC would lead to disappointment among Indian Muslims.

Mamata Banerjee has vehemently stated her refusal to permit the central government to enforce the NRC within her state. One might question her authority to make such a determination. If the central government is striving to enact certain legislation with national security in mind, it seems counterintuitive for a Chief Minister to obstruct it. Her rationale appears to rest on an unsubstantiated claim that Muslims would be adversely affected. But why is that the case? The following are Mamata Banerjee's statements, in which she attempts to justify her position for the sake of her voter base, although these justifications seem detached from reality. Here are my thoughts on these objections:

Mamata Banerjee, the Chief Minister of West Bengal, was known for her strong opposition to the implementation of the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in the state. Her stance was based on several reasons:

• Humanitarian Concerns: Mamata Banerjee expressed concern that the implementation of the NRC could lead to the exclusion of a significant number of genuine Indian citizens, especially marginalized and vulnerable populations who might struggle to provide the required documentation. She was worried that this could result in people being rendered stateless and facing humanitarian crises.  

This assertion lacks a strong foundation as it centers on the validation of citizens' authenticity. We cannot permit our nation to suffer due to the infiltration of outsiders. If individuals are indeed genuine citizens, they should be able to produce supporting documents. Conversely, those who cannot do so may find themselves living as refugees. Consequently, they would not possess the privilege to cast their votes. This situation poses a significant challenge for Mamata Banerjee. Her main concern seems to revolve around the voting rights of these individuals. Denying them voting eligibility would render them advantageous for Mamata Banerjee's TMC party. Presently, they constitute her core voter base, with a significant portion being Muslims. This is likely why she is approaching the Muslim issue in a defensive manner.

• Political Opposition: Banerjee is a prominent leader of the Trinamool Congress (TMC) party in West Bengal. Her opposition to the NRC also had political motivations, as it helped her rally support among minority communities and portray herself as a defender of their rights. This was particularly significant given the religious and ethnic diversity of West Bengal's population.

Indeed, the stance appears to be influenced by political motives, which is why she opposes implementing the NRC within the region. The primary apprehension revolves around Muslim voters who stand to lose their foothold. A substantial number among them are believed to have immigrated from Bangladesh, and they currently form a significant support base for the TMC party. The question arises: why should we grant them the privilege of voting if they are unable to establish their citizenship?

• Fear of Disruption: The implementation of the NRC involves a complex and often controversial process of verifying citizenship based on documents. Banerjee was concerned that such an exercise could lead to social unrest, given the diverse demographics of West Bengal, and potentially disrupt the harmony in the state.

What sort of disruption would ensue? We're simply aiming to recognize, register, and accord rights to the legitimate citizens of our nation. It's unreasonable to allow our resources and the rights of our own populace to be consumed by those who are in the wrong. We mustn't permit our resources to be taken advantage of by infiltrators who are residing within our country without proper authorization. These very individuals are the ones constantly flouting our laws, disturbing local communities, and posing security risks to our nation.

• Economic Impact: The process of implementing the NRC can be financially burdensome, requiring significant resources and administrative efforts. Banerjee may have also been concerned about the economic implications of diverting resources to this exercise instead of developmental initiatives.

Certainly, there will be an economic impact on the regional economy. However, this is not a substantial concern that should hinder the implementation of the NRC. The central government is responsible for executing this initiative and is accountable for managing the budget in a way that prevents adverse effects on the state economy due to specific expenditures.

• Legal and Constitutional Concerns: There were debates about the constitutionality and legality of the NRC process. Mamata Banerjee, like some other political leaders, expressed concerns about potential violations of citizens' rights and the federal structure of the country.

In this regard, a legal framework has already been formulated, and other regions are also in the process of executing it. The apprehension arises primarily from political parties. If they encourage their supporters to facilitate its seamless implementation, then external threats can be mitigated. The procedural, legal, and constitutional concerns will be addressed by the implementing authority.

• Unpredictable Outcomes: The NRC process had been implemented in Assam, another Indian state, leading to a complex and controversial outcome with a large number of people left off the list. Banerjee may have been wary of similar complications and uncertainties arising in West Bengal.

Indeed, this undertaking should be approached with careful consideration and meticulous oversight, incorporating a dual verification process. The authority of the State Government is imperative for the enactment of this legislation within the region. Their responsibility lies in guaranteeing the completion of all NRC procedures, ensuring the proper enrollment of every genuine citizen into the register. For individuals unable to furnish proof of their domicile, a secondary verification through references is necessary. Should this reference authentication not pass, such individuals ought to be deemed as infiltrators into the nation and treated as refugees. Consequently, they should not be granted the privilege of voting. This course of action should be undertaken solely on humanitarian grounds.

There's no hidden threat to genuine Indian citizens from the implementation of the NRC; however, the only distress comes from political parties who purport to champion the cause of minorities, yet seem solely concerned about Muslims. Their unease stems from the potential impact on their voter base due to the identification of unauthorized entrants. At present, various unauthorized Bangladeshi residents in India are casting their votes for these parties.

I won't divulge the specific name of political parties, but those who are standing against the implementation of the NRC are endorsing the cause of those illicit migrants in India. They are the wrongdoers who facilitated the issuance of Aadhar cards, PAN cards, and other domicile documents to these infiltrators.

To these parties, I pose a question: Why cry foul when your own actions lead to consequences? Why stoke the flames of illegal immigration, endangering the country? If the humanitarian aspect is the basis for such infiltration, then treat them as refugees and provide them sustenance, but abstain from granting them voting rights. They don't invest their allegiance in India; they don't consider it their homeland. Look at the situation in France, where showing compassion to Syrian refugees has resulted in them now posing a considerable threat to national security, setting the country ablaze.

I have a specific appeal to the Bhartiya Janta Party, or #BJP, urging them to pursue such legislation and take the necessary actions for implementation without being overly concerned about votes. The people of India will offer their prayers for you to safeguard the nation from those stagnant elements that are corroding our country from within.

NRC draft of Asssam is here 

Still decision to be taken :  Report  by Hindustan times  dated Mar 22, 2023 08:30 AM IS 

**********************************************************************************